Don’t Feel Like a Chump When You Close on Your New Mortgage
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4667/a46677165d557fb67f1aa938f2fd96b500b79c60" alt=""
Mortgage closing costs dropped 7 percent over the past year, falling to $1,847 on a $200,000 loan, according to a new analysis by Bankrate.
Typical closing costs varied by state, ranging from $2,163 in Hawaii to $1,613 in Ohio. You can find the average rate for your state in the table below.
Lenders compete for business, so shopping around with at least three mortgage providers can help you reduce the fees associated with your loan. “Homebuyers have more say over closing costs than they think,” Bankrate Senior Mortgage Analyst Holden Lewis said in a statement.
Even as banks lower their mortgage fees, they’re increasing fees in most other categories, according to MoneyRates.com.
While lower mortgage fees are good news for homebuyers and those refinancing their loans, the average saving amount to just $140. That’s not much relative to the total costs associated with buying a house. The average down payment for homebuyers in the first quarter of 2015 was $57,710, for example.
Related: Want Your Own Home? Here’s How to Do the Math
The costs don’t stop once the buyers move in. On top of mortgage payments, homeowners face an average of more than $6,000 in additional costs related to their house, including homeowners insurance, property taxes and utilities.
The National Association of Realtors expects home prices to increase 6.5 percent this year to a median $221,900, which would put them at the same level as their 2006 record high.
For buyers, better news than the lower mortgage fees is that rates remain relatively low, falling to 3.98 percent last week, per Freddie Mac.
Closing costs | |||
---|---|---|---|
State | Average origination fees | Average third-party fees | Average origination plus third-party fees |
Alabama | $1,066 | $776 | $1,842 |
Alaska | $935 | $922 | $1,857 |
Arizona | $1,208 | $761 | $1,969 |
Arkansas | $1,057 | $760 | $1,817 |
California | $937 | $896 | $1,834 |
Colorado | $1,192 | $719 | $1,910 |
Connecticut | $1,074 | $960 | $2,033 |
Delaware | $904 | $924 | $1,828 |
District of Columbia | $1,077 | $718 | $1,794 |
Florida | $1,028 | $778 | $1,806 |
Georgia | $1,058 | $821 | $1,879 |
Hawaii | $1,033 | $1,130 | $2,163 |
Idaho | $894 | $788 | $1,682 |
Illinois | $1,080 | $767 | $1,847 |
Indiana | $1,067 | $770 | $1,837 |
Iowa | $1,161 | $762 | $1,923 |
Kansas | $1,047 | $753 | $1,800 |
Kentucky | $1,060 | $737 | $1,797 |
Louisiana | $1,060 | $817 | $1,877 |
Maine | $897 | $830 | $1,727 |
Maryland | $1,093 | $742 | $1,835 |
Massachusetts | $905 | $851 | $1,756 |
Michigan | $1,072 | $746 | $1,818 |
Minnesota | $1,067 | $689 | $1,757 |
Mississippi | $1,046 | $837 | $1,884 |
Missouri | $1,040 | $792 | $1,833 |
Montana | $1,062 | $855 | $1,917 |
Nebraska | $1,047 | $770 | $1,817 |
Nevada | $1,002 | $848 | $1,850 |
New Hampshire | $1,084 | $750 | $1,835 |
New Jersey | $1,181 | $913 | $2,094 |
New Mexico | $1,076 | $876 | $1,952 |
New York | $1,032 | $879 | $1,911 |
North Carolina | $1,036 | $875 | $1,911 |
North Dakota | $1,045 | $791 | $1,836 |
Ohio | $933 | $681 | $1,613 |
Oklahoma | $1,027 | $734 | $1,761 |
Oregon | $1,080 | $785 | $1,864 |
Pennsylvania | $1,055 | $678 | $1,733 |
Rhode Island | $1,093 | $802 | $1,896 |
South Carolina | $1,058 | $837 | $1,895 |
South Dakota | $1,055 | $704 | $1,759 |
Tennessee | $1,033 | $773 | $1,806 |
Texas | $1,031 | $833 | $1,864 |
Utah | $909 | $788 | $1,697 |
Vermont | $1,074 | $862 | $1,936 |
Virginia | $1,050 | $787 | $1,837 |
Washington | $1,077 | $824 | $1,901 |
West Virginia | $1,067 | $904 | $1,971 |
Wisconsin | $1,047 | $723 | $1,770 |
Wyoming | $874 | $814 | $1,689 |
Average | $1,041 | $807 | $1,847 |
Bankrate.com surveyed up to 10 lenders in each state in June 2015 and obtained online Good Faith Estimates for a $200,000 mortgage to buy a single-family home with a 20 percent down payment in a prominent city. Costs include fees charged by lenders, as well as third-party fees for services such as appraisals and credit reports. The survey excludes title insurance, title search, taxes, property insurance, association fees, interest and other prepaid items.
Top Reads from The Fiscal Times:
- You’re Richer Than You Think. Really.
- The 10 Fastest-Growing Jobs Right Now
- The 5 Worst Cities to Raise a Family
Chart of the Day: A Buying Binge Driven by Tax Cuts
The Wall Street Journal reports that the tax cuts and economic environment are prompting U.S. companies to go on a buying binge: “Mergers and acquisitions announced by U.S. acquirers so far in 2018 are running at the highest dollar volume since the first two months of 2000, according to Dealogic. Thomson Reuters, which publishes slightly different numbers, puts it at the highest since the start of 2007.”
Number of the Day: 5.5 Percent
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f92a6/f92a68617d49d61d8ccef3d608d27c4bc3ac306d" alt="Health Care Quality The debate over national health care aside, more Americans today say they get "excellent health care" than did in the early 2000s, according to <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/150806/rate-own-healthcare-quality-coverage-excellent.aspx" target="_blank""
Health care spending in the U.S. will grow at an average annual rate of 5.5 percent from 2017 through 2026, according to new estimates published in Health Affairs by the Office of the Actuary at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
The projections mean that health care spending would rise as a share of the economy from 17.9 percent in 2016 to 19.7 percent in 2026.
Trump Clearly Has No Problem with Debt and Deficits
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d582d/d582dc59b3492172c5798970ad962915c1d446ee" alt="U.S. President Trump sits at his desk before signing bills at the White House in Washington"
A self-proclaimed “king of debt,” President Trump has produced a budget that promises red ink as far as the eye can see. With last year's $1.5 trillion tax cut reducing revenues, the White House gave up even trying to pretend that its budget would balance anytime soon, and even the rosy economic projections contained in the budget couldn’t produce enough revenues, however fanciful, to cover the shortfall.
The Trump budget spends as much over 10 years as any budget produced by President Barack Obama, according to Jim Tankersley of The New York Times. And it projects total deficits of more than $7 trillion over the next decade — "a number that could double if the administration turns out to be overestimating economic growth and if the $3 trillion in spending cuts the White House has floated do not materialize in Congress,” Tankersley says.
Trump — who once promised to both balance the budget and pay down the national debt — isn’t the only one throwing off the shackles of fiscal restraint. Republicans as a whole appear to be embracing a new set of economic preferences defined by lower taxes and higher spending, in what Bloomberg describes as a “striking turnabout” in attitudes toward deficits and the national debt.
But some conservatives tell Tankersley that the GOP's core beliefs on spending and debt remain intact — and that spending on Social Security and Medicare, the primary drivers of the national debt, are all that matters when it comes to implementing fiscal restraint.
“They know that right now, a fundamental reform of entitlements won’t happen," John H. Cochrane, an economist at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, tells Tankersley. "So, they have avoided weekly chaos and gotten needed military spending through by opening the spending bill, and they got an important reduction in growth-distorting marginal corporate rates through by accepting a bit more deficits. They know that can’t be the end of the story.”
Democrats, of course, have warned that the next chapter in the tale will involve big cuts to Social Security and Medicare. Even before we get there, though, Tankersley questions whether the GOP approach stands up to scrutiny: "This is a bit like saying, only regular exercise will keep America from having a fatal heart attack, so, you know, it's ok to eat a few more hamburgers now."
Part of the Shutdown-Ending Deal: $31 Billion More in Tax Cuts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76318/76318ce55b3ec8fa11cfb8e55ceb0908d9e95111" alt="The U.S. Capitol building is lit at dusk ahead of planned votes on tax reform in Washington, U.S., December 18, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/Files The U.S. Capitol building is lit at dusk ahead of planned votes on tax reform in Washington, U.S., December 18, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/Files"
Margot Sanger-Katz and Jim Tankersley in The New York Times: “The deal struck by Democrats and Republicans on Monday to end a brief government shutdown contains $31 billion in tax cuts, including a temporary delay in implementing three health care-related taxes.”
“Those delays, which enjoy varying degrees of bipartisan support, are not offset by any spending cuts or tax increases, and thus will add to a federal budget deficit that is already projected to increase rapidly as last year’s mammoth new tax law takes effect.”
IRS Paid $20 Million to Collect $6.7 Million in Tax Debts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45e73/45e732168c195513d207f0118cf64d55625c1816" alt="Try Again The IRS provides second chances to get your tax return right with Form 1040X."
Congress passed a law in 2015 requiring the IRS to use private debt collection agencies to pursue “inactive tax receivables,” but the financial results are not encouraging so far, according to a new taxpayer advocate report out Wednesday.
In fiscal year 2017, the IRS received $6.7 million from taxpayers whose debts were assigned to private collection agencies, but the agencies were paid $20 million – “three times the amount collected,” the report helpfully points out.
Like what you're reading? Sign up for our free newsletter.