Don’t Feel Like a Chump When You Close on Your New Mortgage
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4667/a46677165d557fb67f1aa938f2fd96b500b79c60" alt=""
Mortgage closing costs dropped 7 percent over the past year, falling to $1,847 on a $200,000 loan, according to a new analysis by Bankrate.
Typical closing costs varied by state, ranging from $2,163 in Hawaii to $1,613 in Ohio. You can find the average rate for your state in the table below.
Lenders compete for business, so shopping around with at least three mortgage providers can help you reduce the fees associated with your loan. “Homebuyers have more say over closing costs than they think,” Bankrate Senior Mortgage Analyst Holden Lewis said in a statement.
Even as banks lower their mortgage fees, they’re increasing fees in most other categories, according to MoneyRates.com.
While lower mortgage fees are good news for homebuyers and those refinancing their loans, the average saving amount to just $140. That’s not much relative to the total costs associated with buying a house. The average down payment for homebuyers in the first quarter of 2015 was $57,710, for example.
Related: Want Your Own Home? Here’s How to Do the Math
The costs don’t stop once the buyers move in. On top of mortgage payments, homeowners face an average of more than $6,000 in additional costs related to their house, including homeowners insurance, property taxes and utilities.
The National Association of Realtors expects home prices to increase 6.5 percent this year to a median $221,900, which would put them at the same level as their 2006 record high.
For buyers, better news than the lower mortgage fees is that rates remain relatively low, falling to 3.98 percent last week, per Freddie Mac.
Closing costs | |||
---|---|---|---|
State | Average origination fees | Average third-party fees | Average origination plus third-party fees |
Alabama | $1,066 | $776 | $1,842 |
Alaska | $935 | $922 | $1,857 |
Arizona | $1,208 | $761 | $1,969 |
Arkansas | $1,057 | $760 | $1,817 |
California | $937 | $896 | $1,834 |
Colorado | $1,192 | $719 | $1,910 |
Connecticut | $1,074 | $960 | $2,033 |
Delaware | $904 | $924 | $1,828 |
District of Columbia | $1,077 | $718 | $1,794 |
Florida | $1,028 | $778 | $1,806 |
Georgia | $1,058 | $821 | $1,879 |
Hawaii | $1,033 | $1,130 | $2,163 |
Idaho | $894 | $788 | $1,682 |
Illinois | $1,080 | $767 | $1,847 |
Indiana | $1,067 | $770 | $1,837 |
Iowa | $1,161 | $762 | $1,923 |
Kansas | $1,047 | $753 | $1,800 |
Kentucky | $1,060 | $737 | $1,797 |
Louisiana | $1,060 | $817 | $1,877 |
Maine | $897 | $830 | $1,727 |
Maryland | $1,093 | $742 | $1,835 |
Massachusetts | $905 | $851 | $1,756 |
Michigan | $1,072 | $746 | $1,818 |
Minnesota | $1,067 | $689 | $1,757 |
Mississippi | $1,046 | $837 | $1,884 |
Missouri | $1,040 | $792 | $1,833 |
Montana | $1,062 | $855 | $1,917 |
Nebraska | $1,047 | $770 | $1,817 |
Nevada | $1,002 | $848 | $1,850 |
New Hampshire | $1,084 | $750 | $1,835 |
New Jersey | $1,181 | $913 | $2,094 |
New Mexico | $1,076 | $876 | $1,952 |
New York | $1,032 | $879 | $1,911 |
North Carolina | $1,036 | $875 | $1,911 |
North Dakota | $1,045 | $791 | $1,836 |
Ohio | $933 | $681 | $1,613 |
Oklahoma | $1,027 | $734 | $1,761 |
Oregon | $1,080 | $785 | $1,864 |
Pennsylvania | $1,055 | $678 | $1,733 |
Rhode Island | $1,093 | $802 | $1,896 |
South Carolina | $1,058 | $837 | $1,895 |
South Dakota | $1,055 | $704 | $1,759 |
Tennessee | $1,033 | $773 | $1,806 |
Texas | $1,031 | $833 | $1,864 |
Utah | $909 | $788 | $1,697 |
Vermont | $1,074 | $862 | $1,936 |
Virginia | $1,050 | $787 | $1,837 |
Washington | $1,077 | $824 | $1,901 |
West Virginia | $1,067 | $904 | $1,971 |
Wisconsin | $1,047 | $723 | $1,770 |
Wyoming | $874 | $814 | $1,689 |
Average | $1,041 | $807 | $1,847 |
Bankrate.com surveyed up to 10 lenders in each state in June 2015 and obtained online Good Faith Estimates for a $200,000 mortgage to buy a single-family home with a 20 percent down payment in a prominent city. Costs include fees charged by lenders, as well as third-party fees for services such as appraisals and credit reports. The survey excludes title insurance, title search, taxes, property insurance, association fees, interest and other prepaid items.
Top Reads from The Fiscal Times:
- You’re Richer Than You Think. Really.
- The 10 Fastest-Growing Jobs Right Now
- The 5 Worst Cities to Raise a Family
Budget ‘Chaos’ Threatens Army Reset: Retired General
One thing is standing in the way of a major ongoing effort to reset the U.S. Army, writes Carter Ham, a retired four-star general who’s now president and CEO of the Association of the U.S. Army, at Defense One. “The problem is the Washington, D.C., budget quagmire.”
The issue is more than just a matter of funding levels. “What hurts more is the erratic, unreliable and downright harmful federal budget process,” which has forced the Army to plan based on stopgap “continuing resolutions” instead of approved budgets for nine straight fiscal years. “A slowdown in combat-related training, production delays in new weapons, and a postponement of increases in Army troop levels are among the immediate impacts of operating under this ill-named continuing resolution. It’s not continuous and it certainly doesn’t display resolve.”
Pentagon Pushes for Faster F-35 Cost Cuts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a71aa/a71aa36b9b97a8e9942f38d2523d084f450657dc" alt=""
The Pentagon has taken over cost-cutting efforts for the F-35 program, which has been plagued by years of cost overruns, production delays and technical problems. The Defense Department rejected a cost-saving plan proposed by contractors including principal manufacturer Lockheed Martin as being too slow to produce substantial savings. Instead, it gave Lockheed a $60 million contract “to pursue further efficiency measures, with more oversight of how the money was spent,” The Wall Street Journal’s Doug Cameron reports. F-35 program leaders “say they want more of the cost-saving effort directed at smaller suppliers that haven’t been pressured enough.” The Pentagon plans to cut the price of the F-35A model used by the Air Force from a recent $94.6 million each to around $80 million by 2020. Overall, the price of developing the F-35 has climbed above $400 billion, with the total program cost now projected at $1.53 trillion. (Wall Street Journal, CNBC)
Chart of the Day - October 6, 2017
Financial performance for insurers in the individual Obamacare markets is improving, driven by higher premiums and slower growth in claims. This suggests that the market is stabilizing. (Kaiser Family Foundation)
Quote of the Day - October 5, 2017
"The train's left the station, and if you're a budget hawk, you were left at the station." -- Rep. Mark Sanford, R-S.C.