How to Cut Your Homeowner’s Insurance in Half
That lousy credit score is costing you more than a good rate on a loan.
Insurance premiums for homeowners with excellent credit are half the price of premiums for homeowners with poor credit, according to a new report by insuranceQuotes.com. Homeowners with median credit pay about a third more than those with excellent credit.
The difference in premiums varies by state, with homeowners with poor credit in 38 states paying at least twice as much those with excellent credit. Homeowners in West Virginia have the biggest premium gap, with those with poor credit paying more than three times what homeowners with excellent credit pay.
Homeowners in Washington, D.C., and Ohio had the next highest gap in premiums (185 percent), followed by Montana (179 percent).
Related; The Easiest Way to Cut Your Home Insurance Premiums
In general, insurers are putting a higher emphasis on credit scores than they did last year, with scores having a bigger impact this year than last in 29 states. “It’s more important than ever to maintain a solid credit rating by paying their bills on time, keeping their balances low, and correcting errors on their credit reports,” Laura Adams, insurangeQuotes.com senior analyst said in a statement.
California, Massachusetts and Maryland do not allow insurers to consider credit in setting prices, and insurers in Florida don’t use it.
The average U.S. homeowner’s insurance premium is around $950. In addition to making an effort to boost their credit, homeowners should shop around every few years to see if they can find a better rate.
Top Reads from the Fiscal Times:
- The 10 Best States for Property Taxes
- Democrats Are Openly Speculating About an Election without Hillary Clinton
- California’s Latest Nightmare: San Joaquin Valley Is Sinking
Stat of the Day: 0.2%
The New York Times’ Jim Tankersley tweets: “In order to raise enough revenue to start paying down the debt, Trump would need tariffs to be ~4% of GDP. They're currently 0.2%.”
Read Tankersley’s full breakdown of why tariffs won’t come close to eliminating the deficit or paying down the national debt here.
Number of the Day: 44%
The “short-term” health plans the Trump administration is promoting as low-cost alternatives to Obamacare aren’t bound by the Affordable Care Act’s requirement to spend a substantial majority of their premium revenues on medical care. UnitedHealth is the largest seller of short-term plans, according to Axios, which provided this interesting detail on just how profitable this type of insurance can be: “United’s short-term plans paid out 44% of their premium revenues last year for medical care. ACA plans have to pay out at least 80%.”
Number of the Day: 4,229
The Washington Post’s Fact Checkers on Wednesday updated their database of false and misleading claims made by President Trump: “As of day 558, he’s made 4,229 Trumpian claims — an increase of 978 in just two months.”
The tally, which works out to an average of almost 7.6 false or misleading claims a day, includes 432 problematics statements on trade and 336 claims on taxes. “Eighty-eight times, he has made the false assertion that he passed the biggest tax cut in U.S. history,” the Post says.
Number of the Day: $3 Billion
A new analysis by the Department of Health and Human Services finds that Medicare’s prescription drug program could have saved almost $3 billion in 2016 if pharmacies dispensed generic drugs instead of their brand-name counterparts, Axios reports. “But the savings total is inflated a bit, which HHS admits, because it doesn’t include rebates that brand-name drug makers give to [pharmacy benefit managers] and health plans — and PBMs are known to play games with generic drugs to juice their profits.”
Chart of the Day: Public Spending on Job Programs
President Trump announced on Thursday the creation of a National Council for the American Worker, charged with developing “a national strategy for training and retraining workers for high-demand industries,” his daughter Ivanka wrote in The Wall Street Journal. A report from the president’s National Council on Economic Advisers earlier this week made it clear that the U.S. currently spends less public money on job programs than many other developed countries.
